McCulloch v. Maryland · US History

Why did Maryland argue that the national bank was unconstitutional?

  1. Because the national bank refused to issue paper money
  2. Because the Constitution did not list the power to create a bank
  3. Because the bank was fully controlled by the Supreme Court
  4. Because the bank operated only outside of Maryland's borders
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because the Constitution did not list the power to create a bank

Maryland argued that Congress lacked authority because the Constitution did not specifically mention creating a bank. The Supreme Court rejected this narrow view of federal power.

Difficulty: Medium Question 5 of 20

Practice all 20 McCulloch v. Maryland questions

Keep practicing

More McCulloch v. Maryland questions