Why do structuralist critics argue that the 'plot' (or 'fabula') of a story is easily transferable from literature to cinema, while the 'discourse' (or 'sjezut') is non-transferable?
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: Plot is the event sequence, medium-independent; discourse is the medium-specific telling
In structuralist narrative theory, the 'fabula' (plot/story) is the basic chronological sequence of actions and events—the raw narrative material that can be told via a comic book, a novel, a ballet, or a film. The 'syuzhet' (discourse), however, is how those events are structured and presented through a specific medium's unique tools (like syntax and adjectives in prose, or lens choices and editing cuts in film), making direct discourse translation impossible.
Keep practicing
More Literature and Cinema questions
- Which of the following best exemplifies an 'unfaithful' adaptation that is highly celebrated in media studies for its profound cultural rec…
- In the context of adaptation studies, what is 'heritage cinema' often criticized for when adapting canonical literature?
- According to adaptation scholar George Bluestone, when a filmmaker attempts to adapt a novel's mental trope (like a metaphor or simile), wh…
- What does Robert Stam mean when he describes a film adaptation as an act of 'intertextual dialogism' inspired by Mikhail Bakhtin?
- How does the presence of a 'star actor' (e.g., casting a highly famous celebrity in a literary role) introduce what adaptation theorists ca…
- The concept of 'incestuous intertextuality' in cinema and literature occurs when: